User talk:Zendonut
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
American, [hand slap] don't remove if you can't comprehend.
Contents |
[edit] Mmmmm, sunday?
See Wikipedia:Meetup/Boston#Upcoming_meetings....
[edit] wikipedia:WikiProject Chemicals
Hi Zendonut, I was so free as to move your name under participation from an action list for work on improving chemicals articles to the now active Chemicals Wikiproject, one of the Chemistry wikiprojects. That old action list is now much updated, and being worked on, so it don't hold participants names any more. Gladly I invite you to further participate on the work. If this name move is incorrect, my apologies, and feel free to delete you from that wikiproject. Wim van Dorst 08:30, 2005 Apr 13 (UTC).
[edit] Falsifiability
Howdy. I just reverted your change to astrology since I think you made it with good inentions,but with a misunderstanding of what falsifiability meant; "falsifiable" doesn't mean "false". All modern scientific theories and principles are falsifiable; psudosciences like astrology are not. jmac 04:21, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- The astrology article says, "Where it has been tested, astrology has shown a consistent lack of predictive power". This means that at least some forms of astrology have been falsified. The falsification article says: the proposition "All crows are black" would be falsified by observing one white crow.
- How is this different from saying "The proposition that Virgos tend to be fastidious is falsibiable by observing that n percent of Virgos are slovenly?" Astrology, at least in some forms, is falsibiable, and has been falsified.
[edit] Deletion of Nanoliter
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Nanoliter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Nanoliter. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Rifleman 82 00:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey Invitation
Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 08:13, 16 March 2007 (UTC)talk to me
[edit] Free to Be...You and Me
Loved your edit summary on "performers who are still alive, except for the ones who aren't." I did notice that one the other day when building the William's Doll article from it, but was just too busy and too tired. :) Lawikitejana 22:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

