User talk:Zer0z7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:Francia.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Francia.PNG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Exploding Boy 04:21, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate Image:Image-Francia.PNG

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Image-Francia.PNG, by Staeckerbot (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Image-Francia.PNG is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Image-Francia.PNG, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Image-Francia.PNG itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:27, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] References in Francia Almendarez article

First of all, welcome to Wikipedia! You should take a look at the Contributing to Wikipedia and Your first article articles first, as they're quite helpful when starting a new article. In the Francia Almendarez article you listed your references as "Things the article-writer knew and other articles + facts on wikipedia." That is not an appropriate way to list references in a Wikipedia article. You should read the Citing sources section to see how to properly cite references. Also, "things the article-writer knew" counts as original research, and wikipedia has a No Original Research policy. You need to look for sources that report that information and then cite them in your article. I would also recommend looking at similar articles to see how to improve your own articles. Hope that helps!  :-) -- HiEv 06:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Oh yeah, I should also add Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons as another article you need to read carefully since your article is on a living person. -- HiEv 03:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Yeayeaatya

A tag has been placed on Yeayeaatya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Naerii · plz create stuff 21:38, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Yeayeaatya has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Matthew Cappadona

A tag has been placed on Matthew Cappadona requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Acroterion (talk) 21:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Matthew Cappadona constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Will (talk) 21:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC))