Talk:Zazel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Holy fair use overload, Batman!
Is it really needed? Defendable? Desirable? CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 05:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Never mind fair use; how about "Holy porn pics overload, Batman!" Not very encyclopedial, imho. Definitevly deletable! Most likely 75-80 per cent of the blow-by-blow coverage could be deleted, too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.159.198.175 (talk • contribs)
- What I find really striking is that the link to the Adult Movie Database is marked "Warning, contains explicit images", but the images there--really, just the cover, and perhaps a few random covers in the navigation bar--are far less explicit than those on the Wikipedia page. Tahnan (talk) 22:57, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
wikipedia is not censored! and why woud someone how don't like porn read about a porn movie in the first place? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.116.82.68 (talk) 00:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Infobox?
I'm not sure if this needs an infobox, but if so, could any of the editors here find a place for it in the main page? I wouldn't like marring the layout. As for filling in the rest of the data... Hoverfish Talk 19:43, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well, since I was encouraged in WP Films Talk to do so, I went ahead and added it. Hoverfish Talk 14:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

