User talk:Zoidberg.9208

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] April 2008

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. seicer | talk | contribs 21:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

ONE COMMENT on someones talk page is NOT vandalism

Why am I blocked, I made ONE comment on seicer's talk page, and i guess he didnt like it becuase he blocked me INDEFINITLY, siecer seems to be abusing his power. If Im not completely unblocked , can i at least just have a 31h?..INDEFINITE blocking seems a bit harsh for one slightly humorous comment.--Zoidberg.9208 (talk) 12:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Why am I blocked, I made ONE comment on seicer's talk page, and i guess he didnt like it becuase he blocked me INDEFINITLY, siecer seems to be abusing his power. If Im not completely unblocked , can i at least just have a 31h?..INDEFINITE blocking seems a bit harsh for one slightly humorous comment.--Zoidberg.9208 (talk) 12:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)"


Decline reason: "On the contrary, indefinite blocking seems quite appropriate when you're obviously using a sockpuppet account to harass another user. – Luna Santin (talk) 06:06, 6 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Note to administrators: I fixed this unblock template (s/he put it in the original message, nowiki tags included, so it wasn't showing up). I will point out that this user has another account per [1] and seems to know Wikipedia more than either account's contributions would indicate. --Cheeser1 (talk) 05:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Also, for any admins who don't want to dig too much, here's a look at the comments by these two accounts on User talk:Seicer, which is apparently the reason (or one of the reasons) for the block. [2] [3] [4] [5]. Notice that these are (essentially) the entirety of the user's contributions per [6] and [7]. --Cheeser1 (talk) 05:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)