Talk:Zords in Mighty Morphin Power Rangers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Merge

Someone has suggested merging this article with Zord, which rather defeats the purpose of seperating it out in the first place. I think this situation works, and this article is quite long enough without being shoved back into another article. -- Supermorff 18:13, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

  • Agreed. Merge tag removed. Notcarlos 18:26, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
I have put the merger tag back. These articles cover exactly the same subject. If a zord can only be from the series Mighty Morphin Power Rangers, then the content should be brought together and put under the page title Zord, as per Wiki naming conventions. I feel that Zord, in this case is precise enough (not ambiguous), and the singular noun should always be preferred in naming. (see Wikipedia:Naming conventions) Madeinsane 17:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
No, I see the point now. Sorry guys. I guess I just haven't watched enough Power Rangers. Madeinsane 17:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tubby Force?

Okay, somebody has added several references to the "Tubby Force Rangers" on this page. Very funny, and I'm leaving it for now partly because I appreciate the joke and partly cos I'm too lazy to revert it. I'm quite worried that someone might actually take it seriously, though. Anyway, there are also other bits of information peppered throughout the article (such as that the Biozords in Power Rangers: Dino Thunder were made from DNA taken from this season's Dinozords, or that some of the Thunderzords were rebuilt into some of the zords in Power Rangers: Ninja Storm. Is there any canonical evidence to back this up? -- Supermorff 15:30, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

That stuff was speculation, and bad speculation. The original Dinozords were nothing but machines, and machines don't have DNA. The Zords in PRNS were built by the Ninja Academies.

[edit] Droids?

Seeing as how they were only refered to as 'droids' in the original pilot of the series, doesn't it seem a bit excessive to, under every single entry, include the name as it 'may have happeared if zords were still droids'? To me it seems redundant and self-explainatory with the intial clarification...

I agree, not to mention it is totally unsourced speculation (Godzilla-droid?). I'm going to remove it from the article. -- SmokeDetector47( TALK ) 18:57, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Believe it or not, readers love trivia, and if not overdone, a bit of trivia like that can actually be beneficial to the article. I say leave the "droids" references, but with only one mention of each droid name, as not to be redundant. --MVillani1985 05:21, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Titanus or Titanos?

In MMPR, wasn't the toy of the Brachiosaurus-shpaed Zord called "Titanos" as opposed to Titanus? -NP Chilla 03:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

No, here's your proof straight from an eBay auction. http://i22.ebayimg.com/02/i/000/97/91/bb74_1.JPG
Titanus, the toy, spelled with a "U" Crazycarolina 17:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Shogun and Ninja

the Shogunzords and Ninjazords were from different series, but they used the same animal-theme and symbols, and falconzord's toy is compatible with the shogun megazord... how'd saban work that? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.72.21.221 (talk) 03:29, 8 March 2007 (UTC).

The Ninjazords and Shogunzords are both part of the same Sentai series Kakuranger. In Kakuranger, the Falconzord is a mecha distinct from both other megazords, and is compatible with both. bradleyjx 08:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

You'd think I'd have just looked that up, lol. I totally did and now I get it. I think the reason I messed that up is that the alien rangers had their 'battle borgs' too, ... which aren't even in this article.

What is up with these zords. the zord article says that the shogun zords are dormant and the ninja zords were destroyed but the ninjor article clearlly says he took the zords at the start of zeo so can someone figure out which is true and fix the other one.71.166.76.254 (talk) 23:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tank Mode

Largely to my knowledge, I never saw the megazord ever used in the tank mode. It was always a stopover form to the mecha form. If anybody has any proof that it was ever used by itself to fight a monster, then I think it should be mentioned. Also it should be mentioned if the Tank mode was never used. This sort of trivia seems relevant, don't you agree? 65.4.3.86 10:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

The tank mode WAS used, in the first MMPR episode "Day of the Dumpster". Ensign Q 14:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:MMPR-TM NinjaFalconMegazord Bracing for Impact.jpg

Image:MMPR-TM NinjaFalconMegazord Bracing for Impact.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ninjamegacockpit.jpg

Image:Ninjamegacockpit.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Tor the shuttle zord.JPG

Image:Tor the shuttle zord.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Thunder megazord.JPG

Image:Thunder megazord.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)