Talk:Zastava

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zastava article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of Wikipedia Project Automobiles, a collective approach to creating a comprehensive guide to the world of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you are encouraged to visit the project page, where you can contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
Zastava is part of the WikiProject Serbia, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familier with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Zastava 126 PGL

Please see discussion on Talk:Polski Fiat 126p and reply, if you know. Pozdrav, romanm (talk) 22:07, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Moved

This comment from the article moved here:

Some other FIATs were also on Yugoslav market, but I am not sure if they were imported, assembled or built by Zastava. It was the original 600 cm3 version of 600D and FIAT Multipla based model 600.

This may have useful information although it cannot be used in the article as it is. ike9898 14:31, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Splitting article?

I think that the current article is confusing. There is enough information on the weapons side of the business at the moment that could be merged into the Zastava Arms article. A brief mention of Zastava also producing arms would suffice as long as the link to Zastava Arms is provided. Anyone opposing? E Asterion u talking to me? 20:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

I agree! This article is TOO much about AUTO. The bulk of the auto info should be moved to the auto article, and this article should be basicly a three CATEGORY article: 1) Auto; 2) Trucks; & 3) Arms, with EQUAL weight to all three. The rest of the article should just be about parent structure, capitalization, etc. The article can be smaller and still be better. WikiDon 18:28, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Zastava logo1.jpg

Image:Zastava logo1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)