Talk:Zastava M21
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The article is biased : unverified claims of NATO wishing to purchase the rifle for it's allies, "perfect" balance, "low" recoil and similar statements that provide no resources.
I'm not saying the rifle is bad, but the article needs a bit more neutrality.
Guest
That's because article is little more than a copy paste of data on the rifle from Zastava's commercial site. Whilst Zastava makes good assault rifles, there should def. be some evaluation from a source other than it's marketing presentation. Marko Parabucki (talk) 14:04, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Categories: Military history articles with incomplete B-Class checklists | Military technology and engineering task force articles | Start-Class military history articles | WikiProject Firearms | Start-Class Firearms articles | WikiProject Serbia | Unassessed-Class Serbia articles | Unknown-importance Serbia articles | Wikipedia requested photographs of firearms

