User talk:Zeronys

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Tibet appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:45, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia is not a soapbox

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:17, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tibet is Tibet, Not Tibet, China

Not familiar with Wiki's user interface, so just reply here. I respect your view about "neutral", but I can't see the reason why the occupation of Tibet can't be called occupation, since the will of Tibetans is violated. If any country can move in their armed force into any other country, and claim the invaded "part of us," I can't see the righteousness in this.

Zeornys.

I think I already mentioned that Wikipedia is not a soapbox. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, let me say with all due respect, I can't accept the idea of "not being a soapbox."

Anyway, if I have more time, I will try to write a section of "legal status controversy over Tibet."

Zeronys.

Anything on Wikipedia must be verifiable via reliable sources and written from a neutral point of view. Articles that do not follow those rules will be deleted. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:14, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Points accepted. But to some point, high principles somestimes are carried out as if there are some sort of "authritaruian censorship" here. Sorry I have to put it this way.