From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "It was an accident that I blanked the pages, this account is a sockpuppet and there is no reason to keep me blocked, Wikipedia's blocking policy is foolish and Wikipedia is a horrible site that will continue to slow down before stopping in a few years. I have other accounts and I do not vandalise with all of those accounts"
Decline reason: "You have admitted that you are using this account - together with others - as abusive sockpuppets. Request to unblock denied - to the contrary, I am increasing the block length to permanent. - Mike Rosoft 13:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I dont vandalize with my other accounts, there are only a few other ones and I do not vandalize with the other ones, one of them is an administrator account, there not abusive suckpupptets)"
Decline reason: "As an administrator, you should know better than to use sockpuppet accounts to vandalize Wikipedia. Unblock denied, for the second time. Please read on WP:SOCK in the meantime. - Mike Rosoft 13:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
- How exactly would you consider that a reason to unblock this account? --Onorem 13:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Blanking one page. Maybe. Multiple, come on? This guy is reaching for straws. Ronbo76 13:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, as you did to California Gold Rush, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. · AndonicO Talk · Sign Here 13:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Gurbanguly Berdimuhammedow. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Kamope·?·! Sign! 13:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Ronbo76 13:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Onorem 13:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - Please stop vandalizing pages/articles. Ronbo76 13:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, feel free to come back, but please make useful contributions instead, and refrain from vandalising or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. --
Bhadani 13:11, 14 February 2007 (UTC)